Edward (Ed) Jorgenson is senior counsel in the intellectual property group. He has extensive experience in preparing and prosecuting patent applications for a wide range of mechanical, chemical, and computer-related inventions including mail sorting equipment, underground boring equipment, polymers, polymer additives and polymer catalysts, orthodontic devices, catheters, electro-optical connectors, automated business systems along with other devices and methods. Ed has prepared numerous opinions relating to patent validity and infringement, prepared and prosecuted numerous trademark applications, and provided advice and counsel to clients regarding patents, copyrights, trade secrets, and related issues.
Prior to and while attending law school, Ed was employed as an engineer by Inland Steel Company of East Chicago Indiana. He also served in the United States Air Force.
Registered U.S. Patent Attorney
Dallas Bar Association
John Marshall Law Review
Staff Editor
Texas, 1988
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas
IP Audits & Legal Opinions
IP Due Diligence
IP Portfolio Management & Counseling
Patents & Innovations
Trademark & Advertising
While we would like to hear from you, please understand that merely contacting Munck Wilson Mandala does not create an attorney-client relationship with us or impose any obligation on us. Please do not send us any confidential or sensitive information unless and until you have first talked to one of our attorneys and we have entered into a written engagement letter that establishes an attorney-client relationship with us. When you execute an engagement letter from Munck Wilson, you will be our client, and then we may exchange information freely.
By clicking “OK” below, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You also agree that, even if the information you send us is highly confidential and is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, our review of your information does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.