David M. Arvesen is a principal attorney at Munck Wilson Mandala, practicing in the firm’s intellectual property group. He focuses his practice on patent preparation and prosecution.
David prepares and prosecutes domestic and international patent applications in a variety of technical areas including computer hardware and software, telecommunications, HVAC systems, semiconductor devices and fabrications, robotics, and appliances. In addition to patent preparation and prosecution, David represents clients in patent litigation matters covering a wide variety of technologies.
David obtained his bachelor of science in mechanical engineering from Baylor University in 2006. In 2012, he received a master’s in engineering from Texas Tech and Juris Doctor from Texas Tech School of Law. Prior to his legal career, David worked as a project engineer for a railcar manufacturer.
State Bar of Texas
Dallas Bar Association
Intellectual Property Section and Computer Law Section
The Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn American Inn of Court
Texas Rising Stars, Thomson Reuters
2021 – 2023
Texas, 2012
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Copyrights
IP Audits & Legal Opinions
Patents & Innovation
Trademark & Advertising
While we would like to hear from you, please understand that merely contacting Munck Wilson Mandala does not create an attorney-client relationship with us or impose any obligation on us. Please do not send us any confidential or sensitive information unless and until you have first talked to one of our attorneys and we have entered into a written engagement letter that establishes an attorney-client relationship with us. When you execute an engagement letter from Munck Wilson, you will be our client, and then we may exchange information freely.
By clicking “OK” below, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You also agree that, even if the information you send us is highly confidential and is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, our review of your information does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.