Drew H. Nunn is an associate practicing in the firm’s large loss property subrogation group. Drew concentrates his practice on commercial litigation and large loss property subrogation matters.
Drew has assisted attorneys in complex commercial litigation and bankruptcy cases, large loss property subrogation cases, and civil and family law cases. As a law clerk, Drew provided thorough research and advice on cases, reviewed documents, assisted in hearing preparation and draft motions along with other filings.
Drew earned his J.D. from Southern Methodist University’s Dedman School of Law, where he was involved as a student attorney for the Criminal Clinic, on the Board of Advocates for the Environmental Law Moot Court Team, and the Air Law Symposium editor for SMU Law Review Association. Prior to law school, Drew received his B.S. in biochemistry from Texas A&M University.
Prior to joining MWM, Drew gained experience as a law clerk in several firms around Dallas.
Texas, 2021
Drew H. Nunn, Grounded: How the 737 MAX crashes Highlight Issues with FAA Delegation and a Potential Remedy in the Federal Tort Claims Act, 85 J. Air L. & Com. 703 (2020)
Commercial Litigation
Large Loss Property Subrogation
While we would like to hear from you, please understand that merely contacting Munck Wilson Mandala does not create an attorney-client relationship with us or impose any obligation on us. Please do not send us any confidential or sensitive information unless and until you have first talked to one of our attorneys and we have entered into a written engagement letter that establishes an attorney-client relationship with us. When you execute an engagement letter from Munck Wilson, you will be our client, and then we may exchange information freely.
By clicking “OK” below, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You also agree that, even if the information you send us is highly confidential and is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, our review of your information does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.